Nett Review (2026): Pricing, Features & Honest Verdict

Reviewed by MakerStack · Published · 6 min read

TLDR

Nett, branded nettTracker, is accounting software that automates the period-end adjustments accountants used to grind out in spreadsheets: fixed assets, depreciation, prepayments, accruals, and deferred income. It is cheap and integrates two ways with Xero, QuickBooks, and Sage. The scope is narrow and UK-leaning. Best for: firms on cloud ledgers automating adjustments. Price: from GBP 10/mo, 14-day trial. Rating: 6.1/10.

What is Nett?

Nett, which trades as nettTracker, is a focused piece of accounting software built by FarScape Applications Ltd. It does one job: automate the routine financial adjustments that accountants and bookkeepers make at period end. That means fixed asset registers and depreciation, prepayments, accruals, accrued and deferred income, and loan and lease entries. Instead of maintaining spreadsheets and keying journals by hand, you set the rules once and Nett generates the journal entries and pushes them into your accounting software.

The product exists because cloud ledgers like Xero, QuickBooks, and Sage are strong at day-to-day bookkeeping but thin on these recurring adjustments, so firms fell back on error-prone spreadsheets. FarScape, founded around 2019, built Nett with two-way integrations into Sage Business Cloud, Xero, and QuickBooks Online, plus a standalone mode that imports from Excel and exports journals in common formats. Its multi-currency support covers the UK, US, Canada, Australia, South Africa, and Asia, though the product and pricing lean clearly toward UK practices. A loan and lease management module was slated for release in early 2026.

What Are Nett’s Key Features?

Fixed asset and depreciation automation

The core of Nett is the fixed asset register. You record assets once, set the method and useful life, and it calculates depreciation and generates the journals automatically each period, removing the spreadsheet most firms quietly hate maintaining. It tracks disposals and adjustments too, so a sold or written-off asset flows through correctly rather than leaving a stale line in a spreadsheet. It is the feature the product is best known for, and it covers the common depreciation methods, though its multi-book support is only partial, which matters for firms that need to run separate tax and accounting books side by side.

Prepayments, accruals, and deferred income

Beyond assets, Nett handles the other recurring adjustments: prepayments, accruals, accrued income, and deferred income. You set the schedule once, say a 12-month insurance prepayment, and it produces the right period entries automatically, so the monthly or quarterly close stops being a manual exercise of working out fractions and keying journals. For a bookkeeper closing many entities to a deadline, this is where the time savings compound, because the same handful of adjustment types repeat across every client.

Two-way accounting integrations

Nett integrates both ways with Xero, QuickBooks Online, and Sage Cloud Accounting, so it reads your trial balance and asset data and writes the journals back without copy-paste or CSV juggling. That two-way sync is the difference between a tool that saves time and one that just moves the manual work elsewhere. If your ledger is not on the supported list, the standalone mode lets you import via Excel and download journals in standard formats to post manually, which keeps it usable even outside the three core platforms.

Multi-entity firm management

Nett is built with accounting and bookkeeping firms in mind, not just single businesses. Firms manage many client entities under one subscription, buying capacity in blocks of companies, with all features included regardless of tier rather than gated behind upgrades. That flat-feature, multi-entity structure, plus per-company scaling that gets cheaper past 51 companies, is what makes it practical for a practice handling dozens of clients without the per-seat cost ballooning.

How Much Does Nett Cost?

Nett starts at GBP 10/mo (excluding VAT) on the Small Business plan, which covers 1 company, 1 user, 50 assets, 5 accruals or prepayments, and 3 loans or leases. The Professional plan is GBP 30/mo for a single company with unlimited users, unlimited assets, and all features. For practices, the Multiple Companies model is the relevant one: companies come in blocks of 5 at GBP 7.50 each, dropping to GBP 5 per block once you pass 51 companies. All pricing is in GBP and excludes VAT, which underlines the UK orientation.

That is genuinely cheap for what it removes. In the fixed-asset and adjustment niche, heavier platforms cost far more: AssetAccountant, the category leader, is priced for firms that need full lease and multi-book accounting, and tools aimed at complex US filers run higher still. Nett deliberately competes on being the affordable, no-frills option for firms that just want the adjustments automated rather than a comprehensive asset platform.

There is no permanent free plan. New customers get a 14-day trial with full functionality and no credit card, which is enough to run it against a real client file and judge the time savings. Some listings cite a longer firm trial, but the standard subscription trial is 14 days. Given the low entry price, the trial is mostly about confirming the integrations fit your workflow rather than weighing a big spend.

The value case is straightforward and rests on time, not features. If automating depreciation and accruals saves a bookkeeper even an hour per client each month, the GBP 7.50 per block of five companies pays for itself many times over at any normal charge-out rate. That is why Nett’s appeal is strongest for practices with many similar clients doing the same routine adjustments, where the saving multiplies. A single business with one set of assets gets less leverage, but at GBP 10/mo the downside is small either way, which is the point of pricing it this low.

PlanPricePlan FeaturesBest For
Small BusinessGBP 10/mo1 company, 1 user, 50 assets, 5 accruals/prepayments, 3 loans/leasesSingle small businesses
ProfessionalGBP 30/mo1 company, unlimited users and assets, all featuresFirms managing one larger entity
Multiple CompaniesGBP 7.50/blockBlocks of 5 companies, GBP 5/block after 51 companiesAccounting and bookkeeping firms

Who is Nett Best For?

Use Nett if you are an accountant or bookkeeping firm on Xero, QuickBooks Online, or Sage and you make the same period-end adjustments over and over. It is built for exactly that repetitive close work, the fixed assets, depreciation, prepayments, and accruals that eat hours in spreadsheets, and the per-company firm pricing makes it cheap to roll out across many clients. Small businesses managing their own books on a cloud ledger fit too.

Skip Nett if you need full accounting software, because it is an adjustment tool that sits alongside your ledger, not a replacement for it. Skip it as well if your needs are complex: partial multi-book depreciation and a UK-leaning design mean firms with heavy multi-jurisdiction tax or full lease accounting requirements will outgrow it and should look at a deeper platform from the start.

Best Nett Alternatives

AssetAccountant

AssetAccountant is the most complete rival and the one to beat in this niche. It combines Xero integration with full lease accounting, multi-jurisdiction tax books, and multi-entity support, topping independent feature comparisons. It is heavier and pricier than Nett, aimed at firms whose depreciation and lease needs are genuinely complex. Choose it when Nett’s partial multi-book support is not enough.

Asset.Guru

Asset.Guru is a simpler, Xero-integrated fixed asset register that overlaps with Nett’s core use case. It is straightforward for tracking assets and depreciation but does not support multi-book depreciation at all, so it is a fit for smaller, single-book setups. It competes directly with Nett’s entry tier rather than the full firm offering.

Bassets eDepreciation

Bassets eDepreciation is the pick for complex US tax filers. It supports US federal IRS books, all 50 state tax books, and an AMT book, a genuine differentiator that neither Nett nor most rivals match. It is overkill for a UK practice doing standard adjustments, but for US multi-state depreciation it is the specialist option Nett cannot cover.

Final Verdict: Is Nett Worth It?

Nett is a narrow tool that does its narrow job well. It automates the period-end adjustments accountants used to grind out in spreadsheets, integrates two ways with the major cloud ledgers, and prices itself low enough that a firm can deploy it across many clients without thinking hard about the cost. For a practice that closes the same accruals, prepayments, and depreciation every period, the time saved and errors avoided justify the small spend.

The 6.1 rating reflects how limited that scope is. Nett is not full accounting software, its multi-book depreciation is only partial, and the UK and GBP orientation means firms with complex or multi-jurisdiction needs will outgrow it and should start with AssetAccountant instead. If you want a cheap, focused way to kill the period-end spreadsheet on Xero, QuickBooks, or Sage, Nett is worth the 14-day trial, and for a multi-client practice it is one of the easiest tools to justify in this category. If your adjustments are complex, or you need full multi-book and multi-jurisdiction depreciation, buy a deeper platform like AssetAccountant from day one rather than migrating off Nett later.

Nett Pros & Cons

What We Like

  • Automates the period-end grind: fixed assets, depreciation, prepayments, accruals, and deferred income
  • Two-way integrations with Xero, QuickBooks Online, and Sage Cloud Accounting, plus standalone Excel mode
  • Cheap, from GBP 10/mo, and firm pricing scales in affordable blocks of 5 companies
  • 14-day full-feature trial with no credit card to test against your own books

What Could Be Better

  • Narrow scope: it handles adjustments, not full accounting, so it sits alongside your ledger
  • Multi-book depreciation support is only partial, where rivals like AssetAccountant are full
  • UK and GBP leaning, and reviewers note it can be outgrown by complex or multi-jurisdiction needs

Nett FAQ

What is Nett?

Nett, branded nettTracker, is accounting software from FarScape Applications that automates routine period-end adjustments: fixed assets, depreciation, prepayments, accruals, deferred income, and loan and lease entries. It generates the journals and syncs them to your accounting software, replacing spreadsheet work.

How much does Nett cost?

Nett starts at GBP 10/mo (excluding VAT) for the Small Business plan (1 company, 50 assets). The Professional plan is GBP 30/mo for one company with unlimited users and assets. Firms buy companies in blocks of 5 at GBP 7.50, dropping to GBP 5 per block after 51 companies. A 14-day trial is free.

Is Nett worth it?

For accountants and bookkeepers who do these adjustments every period, yes, it is cheap and removes manual, error-prone journal work. It is not worth it if you need full accounting software or deep multi-book and multi-jurisdiction depreciation, where a heavier tool fits better.

What are the best Nett alternatives?

AssetAccountant is the most complete rival with full lease and multi-book support, Asset.Guru is a simpler Xero-integrated asset register, and Bassets eDepreciation suits complex US multi-state tax filers.

Does Nett offer a free plan?

No permanent free plan. Nett offers a 14-day free trial with full functionality and no credit card required, after which paid plans start at GBP 10/mo. Some sources cite a longer firm trial, but the standard subscription trial is 14 days.

Who is Nett best for?

Accountants, bookkeeping firms, and small businesses using Xero, QuickBooks Online, or Sage Cloud Accounting who want to automate fixed-asset tracking and recurring period-end adjustments instead of maintaining spreadsheets.

Disclosure: MakerStack is funded by featured placement fees, sponsor slots and a small number of affiliate links. Nobody paid for this review. Where any of those does apply to a review, we say so on the page. The scoring criteria are the same in every case. See our editorial policy.