Salyence Review (2026): Pricing, Features & Honest Verdict

TLDR

Salyence is a brand-tracking tool that measures Share of Search and AI Share of Recommendation across Google, ChatGPT and Gemini, starting at a $10 one-time snapshot. It is cheap and focused but early and unproven. Best for: marketers tracking brand visibility on a budget. Price: $10 one-time, Pro $45/mo, no free plan. Rating: 6.3/10.

What is Salyence?

Salyence is a brand visibility tool for the moment when people stopped only Googling and started asking AI assistants for recommendations. It tracks two things: classic Share of Search, how much search volume your brand commands versus competitors, and Share of Recommendation, how often models like ChatGPT and Gemini name your brand when asked for suggestions. The goal is to tell you whether you are showing up where buyers now look, which for a growing number of categories is inside a chatbot answer rather than a search results page.

We checked whether this is a real, shipping product or just a waitlist, and it is live. The site has a working sign-up, functional demo reports and public pricing, and you can generate a snapshot by entering a brand, market and category. That is a real test we applied because the product is new and surfaced on BetaList, where plenty of listings turn out to be landing pages. Salyence is not one of those. The company lists contact at hello@salyence.com and mentions operating across Australia, the US, Canada and the UK. It is clearly early-stage, with the thin track record that implies, but it is a usable product rather than a coming-soon page, which is why it qualified for a full review.

What Are Salyence’s Key Features?

Share of Search benchmarking

Salyence measures your brand’s search demand against rivals on Google and Bing, the Share of Search metric marketers use as a leading indicator of market position. Rather than tracking rankings for individual keywords, it tracks how much of the category’s branded search attention you own versus competitors. That framing is genuinely useful for spotting whether a competitor is gaining mindshare before it shows up in sales numbers, which gives a marketing team time to react. It is an established metric, so this part of the product is the least experimental and the easiest to trust.

AI Share of Recommendation

The newer half of the product tests how often AI models recommend your brand. Salyence says it runs roughly 70 prompt variations across LLMs to see when your name comes up and when a competitor’s does instead. As buyers increasingly ask ChatGPT and Gemini for shortlists rather than scrolling search results, knowing whether you make those lists is the thing this tool is really selling, and it is the reason it exists now rather than five years ago. The volume of prompt variations matters here, because a single prompt can be misleading; testing many phrasings gives a more honest read on whether the models genuinely favour you.

Category Entry Points and gap analysis

Salyence frames its prompts around what it calls Category Entry Points, the situational buying triggers that lead someone to search or ask in the first place. By testing across these and across multiple models, it surfaces where competitors are recommended and you are not, highlighting specific gaps and vulnerabilities rather than a single abstract score. This is the more actionable side of the tool, because it points at the exact prompts you are losing, which is something a content or PR team can actually work to fix. A number on a dashboard is interesting; a list of prompts where a rival beats you is a to-do list.

Social Share of Voice

Rounding out the picture, Salyence tracks brand mentions on social platforms, the kind of content that helps train and inform AI systems over time. Combined with search and recommendation, it gives a three-sided view of brand presence: what people search, what AI recommends, and what people say. It is a sensible inclusion that fits the thesis that social conversation feeds AI answers. That said, social listening is a crowded space with mature dedicated tools, so this feature is unlikely to replace a specialist platform if deep social monitoring is your main need rather than a supporting signal.

How Much Does Salyence Cost?

Salyence is priced to remove friction. The entry option, Salyence Pulse, is a $10 one-time snapshot, so you can see your brand’s standing once without committing to a subscription. Salyence Pro is $45 a month and adds weekly intelligence, trend tracking and ongoing competitor benchmarking, with early users getting that rate locked in as a founder discount. There is no free plan, but at $10 the snapshot is close enough to free that the distinction barely matters for a first look.

Against the category, that pricing is aggressive. Profound, the enterprise standard in AI visibility, starts around $99 a month for ChatGPT-only coverage and runs into the mid four figures for full multi-platform monitoring. Peec AI starts near 89 euros a month, with a Pro tier around 199 euros, and Otterly’s budget Lite plan is $29 a month for 15 prompts. Salyence’s $45 Pro undercuts most of them while still covering both search and AI recommendation, which is a strong pitch for a small team that finds the enterprise tools out of reach.

The honest caveat: low price often tracks with shallower coverage. The enterprise tools monitor 10-plus AI platforms, run far more prompts, and have longer track records and bigger customers behind them. Salyence’s value is letting a small team start measuring for $10 to $45, not matching that enterprise depth. For a founder or marketer who just wants to know where they stand, the pricing is the single biggest reason to try it; for a team that needs audited, comprehensive coverage, the low price is also a signal of the product’s current limits.

Who is Salyence Best For?

Use Salyence if you are a marketer, founder or small agency who wants to know how search and AI assistants treat your brand, and you want to find out cheaply and quickly. The $10 snapshot makes it almost a no-brainer for a one-time check, and the $45 Pro plan is reasonable for ongoing tracking on a small budget. For a startup trying to understand its AI visibility for the first time, this is a low-stakes way in.

Skip Salyence if you are an enterprise team that needs broad, audited coverage across many AI platforms with a proven vendor and support behind it. In that case the depth and track record of Profound or Peec AI justify their higher prices, and Salyence’s early-stage status is a risk you may not want to take on a metric your leadership will scrutinise. The same applies if you need integrations, an API, or guarantees that a young product may not yet offer.

Best Salyence Alternatives

Profound

Profound is the enterprise benchmark for AI visibility, monitoring 10-plus AI platforms and trusted by large, recognisable companies. It starts around $99 a month for ChatGPT-only coverage, with Growth tiers around $399 and enterprise pricing in the mid four figures for full coverage. Choose Profound if you need the deepest, most credible coverage and have the budget to match; it far outguns Salyence on breadth and proof, which is exactly what a large brand will want.

Peec AI

Peec AI is a mid-market option starting near 89 euros a month, with a Pro tier around 199 euros covering 100 prompts across several platforms. It is more established than Salyence and sits squarely between budget and enterprise, making it a sensible step up. Pick it if you want more depth and a longer track record than Salyence offers but do not need Profound’s enterprise scale or price.

Otterly

Otterly is the budget-friendly rival, with a Lite plan at $29 a month covering 15 prompts across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot. It carries some industry recognition and is the closest direct competitor to Salyence on price. Evaluate the two head-to-head if cost is your deciding factor and you want a slightly more proven tool; the choice often comes down to which one’s prompt coverage and interface suit you better.

Final Verdict: Is Salyence Worth It?

Salyence earns a 6.3. It is a real, shipping product that does something timely: measuring whether AI assistants and search actually recommend your brand against competitors. The $10 snapshot is a genuinely smart entry point, and the $45 Pro plan undercuts most rivals while covering both search and AI recommendation. For a curious marketer or founder on a budget, it is easy to justify trying, and the Category Entry Point gap analysis is the kind of output you can act on.

The score is capped by its newness, not its idea. Thin reviews, a short track record, and shallower coverage than enterprise tools mean we cannot vouch for it the way we can for established platforms with years of customers behind them. Our recommendation: spend the $10, run a snapshot, and judge whether the gaps it surfaces are useful for your brand. If they are and you need ongoing tracking, Pro is fair value at $45. If you need enterprise depth and proof, look at Profound or Peec AI instead.